{"id":201,"date":"2020-03-18T11:05:07","date_gmt":"2020-03-18T11:05:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/?page_id=201"},"modified":"2020-03-18T11:06:40","modified_gmt":"2020-03-18T11:06:40","slug":"subasinghe-v-police-constable-sandun-and-others","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/?page_id=201","title":{"rendered":"Subasinghe v. Police Constable Sandun and others"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Case Reference\/File No<\/strong> <\/td>[1999] 2 SriLR 23 <\/strong> <\/td><\/tr>
Case Name<\/strong> <\/td>Subasinghe v. Police Constable Sandun and others <\/strong> <\/td><\/tr>
Court <\/strong> <\/td>Supreme Court <\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Date of judgement<\/strong> <\/td>25th<\/sup> Aug and 30th<\/sup> Nov 1998 <\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Judges<\/strong> <\/td>G.P.S. De Silva CJ
Wadugodapitiya J
Bandaranayake J <\/td><\/tr>
Parties<\/strong> <\/td>Petitioner <\/strong>

Subasinghe

Vs.<\/strong> 

Respondents<\/strong> 

1st<\/sup> respondent \u2013 Police Constable Sandun
2nd<\/sup> respondent – a police officer
3rd<\/sup> respondent \u2013 OIC, Dankotuwa Police Station <\/td><\/tr>
Keywords<\/strong> <\/td>Articles 11, 13(1) and (2) of the Constitution \u2013 degrading treatment <\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Head note<\/strong> <\/td>\n  \n <\/td><\/tr>
Brief facts<\/strong> <\/td>The petitioner on 26th<\/sup> Nov 1996 went to the Dankotuwa Police Station to meet the 3rd<\/sup> respondent and since he was absent, next morning, the petitioner met the 3rd<\/sup> respondent and complained about a commercial transaction. Later on the same day, the 1st<\/sup> respondent who was in civil clothes, came up to the petitioner who was near the Dankotuwa Public Market and said that he will come in uniform to teach him \u201ca good lesson\u201d. The next day, the petitioner was taken to the Police Station by 1st<\/sup> and the 2nd<\/sup> respondents, and the 3rd<\/sup> respondent ignored the presence of the petitioner. There the petitioner was beaten by the 1st<\/sup> respondent and was then taken to Dankotuwa Public Market by a private bus that belongs to the Don Bosco church and was made to walk with handcuffs across the market and was brought back. He was then taken to the Dankotuwa District Hospital, and was brought back. He was then put in a cell and beaten again by the 1st<\/sup> respondent. He also noticed that his gold chain which was worth about Rs.20,000 was missing. The 1st<\/sup> respondent had violated the Fundamental Rights of the petitioner guaranteed by article 11,13 (1) and 13 (2) of the Constitution. <\/td><\/tr>
Judicial Precedence<\/strong> <\/td>The Court held that the fact that the petitioner was taken to the town in a private vehicle and was \u201cexhibited\u201d by making the petitioner walk across the public market in handcuffs is a contempt to the dignity of the petitioner as a human being and therefore constructs \u201cdegrading treatment\u201d within the meaning of Article 11 of the Constitution. <\/td><\/tr>
Legislation Title<\/strong> <\/td>Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka <\/strong> <\/td><\/tr>
Area<\/strong> <\/td> Articles 11 and 13 (1) and (2) of the Constitution <\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Download Case File<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Case Reference\/File No [1999] 2 SriLR 23 Case Name Subasinghe v. Police Constable Sandun and others Court Supreme Court Date of judgement 25th Aug and 30th Nov 1998 Judges G.P.S. De Silva CJ Wadugodapitiya J Bandaranayake J Parties Petitioner Subasinghe Vs.  Respondents  1st respondent \u2013 Police Constable Sandun 2nd respondent – a police officer 3rd […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":164,"featured_media":0,"parent":199,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-201","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/164"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=201"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/201\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":204,"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/201\/revisions\/204"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/199"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rightscaselaw.ibj.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}